Financial Dashboard

A financial operating layer for firms running on STAR.

Stop rebuilding the same financial view every time the firm needs answers. Financial Dashboard turns STAR data into fast, frozen, navigable views for WIP, net billings, collections, AR, budgets, and historical comparison, so leadership can move from firm-wide performance to client and engagement detail in one place.

Built for STAR • frozen periods • configurable dimensions • budget / CY / PY / PTD / YTD context • firm-to-client-to-engagement navigation

What firms get right away


WIP, net billings, collections, and AR in one operating view

Frozen periods for stable review, with optional daily refresh for open periods

Navigation by firm structure, client hierarchy, and firm-specific dimensions

A direct path from summary to client and engagement detail

The problem is not missing data. It is reporting friction.

Most firms already have the numbers. Getting them into a form the firm can actually use is what costs time.

Too often, review starts with repeated STAR exports, spreadsheet stitching, manual cleanup, and reconciliation across side workbooks. By the time the numbers are ready, too much effort has gone into producing the report and not enough into reading it.
Financial Dashboard removes that setup work. It gives the firm a consistent financial view that is ready when questions arise, so partners, operations leaders, finance teams, and firm leadership can spend their time reviewing performance instead of assembling it.

What changes in practice

Less manual STAR report assembly

Fewer side spreadsheets and one-off workbooks

Faster review across WIP, net billings, collections, AR, and budgets

One set of numbers across partners, managers, operations, and leadership

A cleaner path from summary to underlying detail

Historical periods preserved as they were

Built on your practice management data.

Shaped around how your firm is organized and how your leaders review the business.

Financial Dashboard starts with the financial data already coming out of STAR and turns it into a fast, frozen reporting environment. STAR remains the system of record. Financial Dashboard becomes the place where the firm reviews, compares, and works through the numbers.
It is built first for firms using STAR, while also allowing financial data from systems such as CCH ProSystem fx Practice Management and IRIS Practice Engine to be incorporated when the underlying data is available.

Configured to reflect your firm, not force your firm into a template

Use standard STAR dimensions, client hierarchies, and firm-specific custom fields in the navigation model, so the way you review performance matches the way your business actually runs.

Common navigation lenses

Industry, office, service line, entity, or franchise

Employee roles such as partner, manager, and supervisor

Parent and child client hierarchy

Standard STAR dimensions

Firm-specific custom STAR fields

See the core financial picture in one place

Financial Dashboard brings together the views firms return to constantly: WIP, net billings, collections, and AR.
Instead of pulling multiple STAR reports just to get to a starting point, the firm works from one environment where the core financial views are already aligned and ready for review.
Net Billings and Collections can also be reviewed with budget, current-year, prior-year, period-to-date, and year-to-date context for the selected period.

Core operating views

WIP

Net Billings

Collections

AR

Context stays in the same view

Move between actual performance, targets, prior-year context, and period-based comparison without jumping across separate reports.
Budget
CY
PY
PTD
YTD through selected period

Move from firm-level signal to client and engagement detail

Financial Dashboard is not a static dashboard. It is a working environment designed to follow the question as it narrows.
Start at the firm level, choose the lens that matters, and move directly into the part of the business that needs attention. At broader levels, the lower pane can show ranked views such as top clients by WIP, net billings, collections, or AR.
As the review becomes more specific, the view shifts naturally from ranked summaries into detail grids such as Client Folder Details, then into child-client and engagement or project records.

How the progression works

Start with the firm-wide picture

Choose the hierarchy or role perspective

See ranked views where ranking helps

Shift into detail when detail becomes the better view

Move into child-client and engagement or project records

Stay inside the same reporting environment throughout

Fast enough to use in the meeting.

Stable enough to trust next quarter and next year.

Financial Dashboard is built on pre-compiled views, so movement through the hierarchy feels immediate. That speed matters because a financial review tool should help the conversation move, not slow it down.
Historical review matters just as much. Closed periods can remain frozen, so the firm can go back and see what the numbers were at that time. Open periods can follow a live-view model with prior-day daily refreshes, with hourly generation available when needed.

How the refresh model works

Pre-compiled views for fast navigation

Closed periods remain frozen

Open periods can refresh daily using prior-day data

Hourly generation is available where it makes sense

Many firms prefer daily frozen review for consistency

Bring more financial reporting into one operating environment over time

Financial Dashboard is not limited to standard STAR views. The lower reporting area can support custom panels that bring additional reporting into the same review flow.
That makes it possible to compare outside data sources, such as ADP, against STAR measures like net billings while keeping the same period structure and navigation model.
Over time, the dashboard can become the place where firms stop stitching disconnected workbooks together and start reviewing more of their financial reporting in one historically preserved environment.

What can expand over time

Third-party reporting panels

ADP and similar external data sources

Comparisons against STAR measures such as net billings

Additional lower-pane analytical views

More reporting needs inside one preserved environment

Why this matters

Fewer disconnected workbooks

Less repeated spreadsheet assembly

More reporting inside one review flow

Shared periods and historical consistency

A shorter path from reporting to action

What makes it operationally useful

Financial Dashboard is not simply easier to look at than manual STAR reporting. It is more usable when the firm is trying to make decisions.
It gives the firm one place to review the numbers, move through the business by the structure that matters, preserve historical periods, compare targets and performance, and follow questions all the way into the underlying detail.
That is why it works day to day for partners, managers, operations leaders, finance teams, and firm leadership. It reduces the distance between seeing the issue and doing something about it.

Removes repeated reporting work

Spend less time exporting, stitching together, and reconciling STAR reports by hand.

Useful in day-to-day firm operations

Built for partners, managers, operations, finance, and leadership, not only for periodic executive review.

Keeps targets and performance together

Review budget, current year, prior year, PTD, and YTD context in the same flow as actual performance.

Preserves history credibly

Frozen periods keep historical analysis stable even when the firm’s structure changes later.

Follows the firm’s actual structure

Use standard dimensions, custom fields, and firm-specific hierarchies that reflect how your firm operates.

Turns review into follow-through

Move from firm-level rollups into ranked views, client detail, and engagement or project records without rebuilding the path manually.

FAQ

Practical questions firms usually ask when evaluating how Financial Dashboard fits into their STAR reporting process.
Does Financial Dashboard replace STAR?
Is this just another BI dashboard?
Can it match our firm’s structure?
Can it use our custom STAR fields?
What does a frozen period mean?
How current can the data be?
Can we compare budget, current year, and prior year?
Can users get from summary to detail?
Is this only for leadership meetings?
Can outside data be added too?
Do we need to change our STAR setup to use it?

See Financial Dashboard in the context of your firm

Review how your current STAR reporting process can become a faster, frozen, navigable financial operating layer.
We can walk through how Financial Dashboard maps to your firm’s structure, reporting priorities, and review workflow, from core financial views to the dimensions, comparisons, and detail paths your team actually uses.
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.